The MAHA report got me thinking. We need a concise slur for people who blindly copy and paste LLM outputs. It needs to say that the person is lazy, ignorant, gullible, disrespectful, and dishonest all at once. Something along the lines of NPC. Maybe parrot? But that’s not too catchy. Any ideas?
GPTrash
Llmorons (le-morons or el-morons?)
LLM-beciles
I actually really like this one. I might start using it.
Agreed. This one is great
Lil-morons?
Yeah I like that.
meat puppet (just dancing to those random numbers)
clipboard (call them by their favorite tool)
AI zomboid (pretty straightforwardly what people can become)
?
I like clipboard. It sounds snappy and implies simple-mindedness.
Be better than using slurs.
The premise of this post is almost impressively stupid. You’re trying to make “fetch” happen without even bothering to come up with “fetch” first, while asking the people it’s supposed to catch on with to come up with it for you.
Is that not democracy manifest?
A succulent chinese meal?
Promptsimp
LLMmings
I could support “lemmings” for sure. They follow one another to their manufactured death, just like those rodents in the movie that someone swept off a cliff.
We need another one for people who think posting, “I asked chatGPT and this is what it said…” is in anyway contributing to anything.
That seems to be a subset of the same thing to me.
anyway
any way
“He who is without sin…”
I asked ChatGPT and this is what it said:
An argument for using ChatGPT and sharing its response is that sharing what ChatGPT said can, in fact, contribute meaningfully—just like quoting a book, article, or expert. If the AI’s response adds insight, solves a problem, or sparks discussion, then referencing it is a valid form of contribution. Dismissing it entirely overlooks the evolving role of AI as a tool in public discourse.
I asked grok to summarize this for me, and it said:
Regarding “white genocide” in South Africa, some claim it’s real, citing farm attacks and “Kill the Boer” as evidence. Interestingly, …
Evertime I tell them that I also have access to chatgpt and if I wanted to ask it I would, I only asked real ppl for answers from real ppl, if you need to ai or even use google, I’m good, I can do that on my own.
There’s a few people at my work who do this. They’ll straight up say it out loud in meetings.
I asked a Llama model on Hugging Face, and this is what it said…
What’s the difference?
I stopped listening to a daily news podcast partly because the hosts did this live on the air. They’d ask ChatGPT for a statistic, then say “ChatGPT says it’s 37% of Americans” or whatever. They never fact-checked it, and based on how consistently wrong LLMs have been in my experience, it called into question everything else they said.
It’s a great way to instantly lose trust in another person’s abilities.
That might be one of the most unhinged used of ChatGPT I’ve seen yet. There’s virtually no linguistic difference between saying one number or another, all possible answers are gonna look identical to the machine. I’d like to see these slopgobblers try to ask the same question several times and see the results
Yeah it’s basically asking “give me a statistic that feeds the current Internet vibe on the topic”
67% of statistics are made up on the spot.
The French have a good inside joke. Just call them cat farts.
I see what you did there. But would you call the perpetrators farts or the slop they produce?
- dunces
- ninnais (ninny)
- septics
- aiffets (effete)
- feaibles
- vaicunts
personally I like septics and vaicunts, but calling someone a ninny(ninnai) is so much fucking fun and will clearly infuriate even the most brain dead person.
Can’t use “septics”, the Aussies need that one to be hateful to Americans (though they usually say seppo)
I don’t think I’ve seen “ninny” in my life. It might be because English isn’t my first language, or perhaps I’m lacking some knowledge but I don’t frequently come across new words these days. I’d argue a lot of people including most brain dead ones would have no idea what you’re talking about.
It’s quite an old-fashioned word - you might find it in some classic literature. Less so online. Short for ‘nincompoop’, I think - both words mean a foolish and incompetent person.
Chatbot Shill
Why don’t you ask chatgpt to come up with a slur?
ironically. a good idea
i did, and it suggested LLMmings, which makes me suspicious about the one who suggested that @NRay7882@lemmy.world
Well if a bot on the internet gave you the answer then it must be true.
Retards?
Slop slingers.
Combining yours with the one by @vala@lemmy.world, we get “Slop gobbler”
Slop slingers are purveyors, slop gobblers are consumers.
Yeah, that might be better. But then we need a name for people who are genuinely convinced by AI junk, since I think “gobbler” implies a willingness to consume.
Slopvangelicals.
Slaptists.
LLM thumpers.
Slop gobbler
I propose combining the two to make “Slopper.”
Edit: Another comment below made the same suggestion first.
I kinda like Sloppler
Why do we need a new one?
Calling them “fakers” seems to get them all huffy already. And if you really want to piss off an AI “prompt writer”, point out to them that they aren’t actual artists.
Botlicker
Clippy (the old Office assistant)