That’s giving them too much credit, I’m sure many of these are also Republicans pretending to be Democrats. After all, it’s what Kirk would’ve done
The disciple of none other than Dean Browning
There’s absolutely that, but we know the troll farms are operating for a fact.
You are just spreading xenophobia against bots!
you can’t be xeonophobic against something that isn’t alive. thats like saying im spreading xenophobia against hammers. its just a tool, being used, by HUMANS
then you are xenophobic against humans that use bots!
Im a lifelong democrat who lives in the beautiful warm water port city in California
Russian and Chinese bots used to out themselves with weird cultural misunderstandings of western countries all the time
The spam detection works, though!
(As intended - on the ones criticising these posts.)
Lol
As a lifelong Democrat, I didn’t know what to make of Charlie Kirk. I’ve since spent several lunch breaks watching his assassination (FULL video) and have come away with the impression that we got him all wrong. The reaction from those on my side of the aisle have really made me
Show more
Damn. When have the democrats ever really made me show more? This comment has converted me to a full blown nazi 'publican
I need a trans person to bash and a baby to neglect. NOW.
What I really don’t understand is why are we still seeing copy-pasted messages from bots in 2025. We have LLMs now. We had for a couple of years. It’s not that hard to generate unique messages. You’d think (the people operating) these bots would use that?
Bots on social media are like toupées, they look fake, unnatural and are easy to spot.
Does it mean that bots/toupees look fake and unnatural ? No, it means that we can only spot the bad ones, the good ones stay unnoticed.
is there an analogy where all toupees look like roadkill because i have a family member that needs to embrace his baldness.
The government isn’t known to use up-to-date technology.
deleted by creator
IP: Russia.
I have no proof of the three specific users in the screenshot being Russian, but they do the exact same thing to neighbouring European states to drive division and push them to far right leaders, who are easier to corrupt and onboard for Putin/Russia. Right now they’re kicking out a whole lot of Charlie Kirk misinformation to capitalize on fractures in the US.
https://www.newsguardrealitycheck.com/p/russian-chinese-and-iranian-state
Can a Russian bot be a lifelong democrat?
I would assume that the US understanding of corporate “speech” rights (per Citizens United) will at some point lead to a Supreme Court ruling that grants explicit personhood (including the right to political affiliation) to corporations and AI bots by extension.
“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”
It’s not even halfway decent writing. It’s quite obvious that many or most mainstream Democrats do not represent left-wing voters, because they’re centrist and pro-corporate, and a lot of the voters are not.
If you’re going to have your bots doing s***, why not get a halfway realistic message for them to spread?
of course they are all “verified”, like if some bot owner can’t afford $3/month
It’s hard to believe that they can watch full videos in a lunch break.
This is genuinely depressing. This isn’t people getting their orders and posting thusly, this is one asshole with their bot accounts. Most of Social Media is malarkey, Dead Internet Theory will slowly become true as AI invades more and more spaces.
Even though it’s true that the left has messaging problem, the right has an efficient propaganda machine well oiled by the monied interest.
So am I one of those people who used to be a huge conservative and I did listen to Charlie years and years ago. I watched way too many of his little debates.
But once you get out of the echo chambers and start questioning anything he said, you would be attacked instantly by the right.
Charlies main thing was to take someone’s serious question, and focus on one little part he could exploit and drill them for it. It was a great way for his supporters to say “YEAHHHH GET EM!!!” While the person asking the question never got an actual answer and instead was laughed at and mocked.
It was all propaganda and designed to separate people and he was a horrible person.
That’s how social media gives impression that there is more hard right people.
Unfortunately it also amplifies the existing ones, because makes them think they are the majority.
how social media
Yes but also
how Russia funds social media bots
this was also all over reddit posts, to with the exact same messaging,"a democrat that supports charlie kirk.
Yeah and Facebook, and Instagram, and truth social, and TikTok and etc etc
social media
Hell, PBS news last night kicked off with coverage of Kirk’s memorial service, which they described as having a “massive” turnout. Interesting that they never used the word “massive” to describe the recent anti-MAGA protests.
Pbs has gotten bad lately. One of their correspondents just endorsed the lie about command and control from gazan hospitals, he saw it first hand. Then they allow some Unapologetic is real hack to come on and lie about what they are doing with no pushback. Then stuff like this. I do not know if I can even watch them anymore if they are going to just give up and run with the party line.
I sometimes describe the PBS News Hour as “Fox News aimed at old white liberals”. I’ve been trying to wean my parents (old white liberals) off of it, but they go all the way back to the days of The MacNeil/Lehrer report and they just can’t accept that it’s become something entirely different decades later. The sad thing is that watching it every night leaves them suicidally depressed but they can’t stop themselves.
Compared to the rest they were doing a decent job in many respects but it seems to me like they just gave up and surrendered any sort of journalistic Integrity just this last week. I understand they might have to bring out a pro-israel person, but not one pushing through such blatant fall cities with the interviewer nodding along and agreeing with everything they say. I got to find the name of that interviewer so I can let other people know how much of a piece of shit he is.
That’s how I would describe CNN.
I haven’t watched to much this week, but the issues with Charlie Kirk have extended to every news platform. Earlier this year, they were pretty good about their reporting on Palestine which leads me to believe this is an issue with that particular host.
Tbf the memorial filled the stadium and people had to go into a prepped overflow space. Objectively speaking, that’s a good amount of folks.
NPR used terms like “flooding the streets” and “5 million people” to describe the anti maga protests, which should scratch the itch?
What articles are you referring to that don’t cover the protests to your satisfaction?
If you’re going to go after public broadcasting, which just lost all of its federal funding, I hope you have receipts.
The fact that anyone believes anything anyone says online anymore is ludicrous. Opinions were swayed by bots, that then pushed legitimate people over into an unrealistic ideology. Sure, there are REAL people saying this toxic shit, but it was all pushed over the edge by bots/bad actors.
The danger comes when people think ANY of these “top comments” are what ‘the public really thinks’.
We need a new net with no bots. with PRIVACY and no bots.
All verified accounts too. 🙄
Reminder to everyone: you can monetize being a blue-check twitter user if you get enough followers and engagement.
It’s not much, but in places like India and other countries, it’s more than enough to live on, and as a result there are HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of shill accounts based in India and other countries, who just circulate each other, follow each other, retweet each other and recycle the same Grok talking points and hollow phrases all day, every day.
Our entire political landscape is being propped up on the backs of people who do not know or care about what happens in the USA and are just shaving off as much as they can by riding along like the remoras that follow sharks.
How do I get in on this? Never used Twitter, but I will for money.
Repeat right-wing bullshit all day and push nazi takes on midwest white women until you get retweeted enough that you make a couple bucks. Helps if you actually farm like, 60 accounts on burner phones, each doing the exact same thing.
Helps more if like, a million of your friends do the same thing.
Don’t forget that “live in a place with an extremely low cost of living” is a part of this equation as well.
I don’t know if anyone in the US could actually live on that sort of Twitter income.
That’s my point in my original comment, that the rate of return for the effort is just enough to recruit an army of foreigners to influence our politics.
I don’t have negative feelings towards people in India trying to survive by using any means necessary, I certainly get it, these are humans with lives and families and the opportunity is just dangled in front of them.
But these are people who don’t have to live in the country they help tear down to ashes and rubble by supporting right-wing, fascist propaganda.
Ain’t nobody got time for that
Then the smoke got me… I got bronchitis!
It’s not “verified”, it’s “premium”
Yes, but when Elon bought Twitter, he said adding a paid subscription was a way to verify accounts.
We all knew it was bullshit, but we should still call them out on lying.
Removed by mod
