• DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hehehe. It’d be hilarious to see the whole prosecution fail because they were unsustainably aggressive and sloppy.

  • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    Trump administration screwed the pooch big on this. This has got to be a mistrial… it being inferred he was a left wing extremist like some others in the news right now was so stupid… dummies…

      • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, unfortunately, as of recently, there has been an uptick in violent leftist extremism. If this administration has been expecting violence from the left, unfortunately, the left has certainly delivered.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Is the violent leftist extremism in the room with us right now?

          • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Nothing specific, but this is a good opportunity for you. Google “uptick in violent left extremism” or something similar. You can find all sorts of articles from different news organizations. Try not to be too surprised…

            • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah, impossible to imagine why people would be getting violent against literal Nazis taking over our country. Maybe you should look out for yourself, buddy.

            • Railing5132@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              “Nothing specific”

              I. E.: "I pulled this ‘thought’ directly out of my ass and presented it as a fact hoping to bullshit someone into believing it, then put the onus on them with a self-fulfilling shit-bot search aided by shit-Ai summaries that absolutely will hallucinate a response saying: “yes, there has been an uptick in violent left extremeism

              You’re out of your damn mind.

              • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                5 months ago

                I hope your self-delusion isn’t as bad as it appears. Ive already told you what to Google to find relevant articles by mainstream news sources.

                No, nothing specific. If I cared enough I would send you 5 links with relevant stories about how violence being performed by leftist extremist is on the rise.

                If you keep pushing ill link you the articles, but please, be a big boy and do your own research.

        • KingArnulf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Please provide evidence of this uptick in violent leftist extremism.

          • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            5 months ago

            I shouldn’t have to do this. This information is being covered by the liberal media, why are yall seeing this? This isn’t even an “extraordinary” claim. Its the cognitive dissonance that can keep people from seeing things that challenge their own ideas and beliefs.

            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/galleries/article-15136055/Report-Left-wing-terrorists-carry-attacks-conservatives.html

            https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/09/charlie-kirk-left-wing-terrorism/684323/

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/09/25/political-violence-leftist-right-wing/

            • toddestan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              “Right-wing extremists were responsible for the vast majority of domestic terror attacks and foiled or aborted plots in the past 30 years, followed by Islamic jihadis.”

              Yes, clearly it’s the left that’s the problem.

              “However, left-wing attacks were very rarely fatal with only two deaths since 2020 - Luigi Mangione’s alleged assassination of UnitedHealthcare boss Brian Thompson last year, and Michael Reinoehl’s fatal shooting of right-wing protester Aaron Danielson in Portland, Oregon, in August 2020.”

              Well, so much for your claim of “uptick in violent leftist extremism”. Two deaths, and that’s giving you Luigi Mangione as an extreme leftist, which itself is a pretty dubious claim.

              But hey, at least right wing attacks were down the last few years. I wonder why that might be?

              “CSIS said Joe Biden’s crackdown on far-right groups after the January 6, 2021, insurrection also helped, as it left extremist movements in disarray.”

              Oh hmm… well good thing all of those insurrectionists are still in jail so they can’t do any more harm. Oh…wait a minute…

              • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Well, so much for your claim of “uptick in violent leftist extremism”.

                Wasn’t really my own claim, im just repeating what many news sources are saying, and in one way or another, they are saying violent leftist extremism is on the rise. Why do you seem so personally irked by this? I haven’t really made any other argument other than what I just said. The violence from leftist extremist is on the rise. Thats it. Quit with whataboutisms. It is it what it is. Dont make assumptions, and dont put words in others mouths.

                • toddestan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You literally said the following.

                  Well, unfortunately, as of recently, there has been an uptick in violent leftist extremism.

                  Didn’t see that being attributed to some news source, or quoted or anything like that. That was something you most definitely claimed.

                  Though the best part has to be this.

                  Why do you seem so personally irked by this?

                  Followed by:

                  Dont make assumptions, and dont put words in others mouths.

                  I have to say, you people are hopeless.

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              You remind me of Julius Streicher. He used the same evidence standards as you do. He argued that left wing violence was out of control. He did so, like you, not through statistics, but anecdote. He would demonize minority groups and ideologies by breathlessly posting the few crimes committed by them, while ignoring the overwhelming number of crimes committed by conservatives or the racial majority. Fascists thrive on anecdotes and hypotheticals and wither in the face of actual statistics.

              As for your buddy Streicher? We hanged him in 1946 at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity and incitement to genocide.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Putin has been trying to get a “color revolution” going here for nearly two decades and Trump loves the idea because they think they could end local governance and any hint of new elections if that happens. That’s why you see rhetoric everywhere about how “you can’t fix this with elections” and “this only ends one way.”

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      it being inferred he was a left wing extremist like some others in the news right now was so stupid… dummies…

      I have to disagree because I think this conclusion is a trap.

      The people listening to that stuff and eating it up? Yeah, dummies.

      The people SAYING that stuff though? It feels very intentional because it’s a win-win for them. At the beginning they get the base riled up, donating, and engaging with the propaganda machine. Then later on when Luigi suddenly gets off on a technicality, the outrage over that fuels even more furor, donating, and posting/watching.

      Conservatives live on outrage. It is irresistible to them. Especially to the white persecution complex ones like my extended family, god damn.

  • lauha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Would be funny if they had to let him go because they were so sloppy

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are sloppy. It they won’t let him go. Owners need this guy in prison, he did it or not

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Now the crucification will cost them so much credibility.

          It’s a nice thought, but no it won’t. The 99% that always vote two-party really don’t give a fuck about anything other than what their favorite news broadcast tells them to, and all the news broadcasts villainized Luigi and tripped over themselves talking ad nauseum about Thompson being an innocent victim, and a family man, etc. etc. etc.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In the Alec Baldwin case it seems to me the important people at the office took on the case because it was so high profile. They screwed it up because of their inexperience with actually doing any work.

      Could be the same thing happening with this case.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        And after the DoJ historically having a 99%+ success rate in front of Grand Juries, this administration has had loss after loss, absolutely unprecedented.

        They don’t even get a chance to learn from their mistakes, because they just blame their losses on liberals, somehow. They are convinced that they are right in their legal strategies, so they keep on the same path, despite going over the same cliff, every time.

        • nickiwest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          We all know that’s because Trump insists on the DOJ following his orders even though he doesn’t understand the law, right?

          Under qualified Presidents, the DOJ was expected to maintain high standards of ethics and follow the law. That meant bringing indictments with enough evidence to win cases and not prosecuting cases when the evidence didn’t support them.

          Under the current clown-shoes administration, the DOJ is expected to bring indictments against anyone who hurt Little Donny’s feelings, regardless of the evidence. And (at least for now) the rest of the judicial system is still following the law, which means that those cases get no traction.

  • shittydwarf@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hilarious, they were so thirsty to bust someone they fumbled literally everything. Their evidence chain of custody was fucked, no way to prove it’s authentic or untampered

    • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I knew it was horseshit the moment they just found the three things that were impossible to find “from a good Samaritan” all in one neat place. Look at this man right here, he has suspect, motive, and murder weapon on his person’s right now!

      This whole case stinks like shit.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        The actual killer was good enough to escape and hide for days. He’s long gone and hiding now. Not in a McD’s with all his evidence.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Their facial recognition software gave them some people that vaguely resembled the killer. They dug through their backgrounds and found a queer kid living in a youth hostel, someone estranged from their family. If you were going to pick an innocent person to pin this on, he’s the classic type. Cops have been pinning unsolved crimes on drifters and other undesirables for centuries.

          Want to know what I want to know? Where is Luigi’s workshop? That’s my question. How the hell do you print out, machine, refine, prototype, and build a 3D printed gun while living in homeless shelters and youth hostels?

          Printing a gun is not like printing a page on a laser printer. It can be done, but it requires a long iterative process and a whole workshop worth of tools. If you want to convince me Luigi made a 3D printed gun, then you damn well better be able to show me his workshop.

          So again. Where is Luigi’s workshop?

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    They have done it that way for everyone since coming into power. Even if they know thr proper procedures, they have continually shown no desire to follow them

    • Cruel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty sure they didn’t commit a crime. And it’s not uncommon for these things to happen in high profile cases. A “fair trial” is very difficult.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        it’s literally a violation of his sixth amendment rights as an American citizen.

        it’s a crime to violate the rights given to citizens through the constitution.

        just to say again.

        a crime was committed.

        where is the difficulty exemption?

        1000002055

        • Cruel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re under the mistaken belief that it’s criminal to violate Constitutional rights.

            • Cruel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              That’s two or more people conspiring to violate rights. People still routinely have their Constitutional rights violated and it’s not criminal. I’m literally litigating a § 1983 federal lawsuit right now. It’s rarely criminal. Just stop spreading misinformation.

              • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                a 1983 is a deprivation of rights and amounts to a finding of legal implication. it’s a far more serious section compared to 241 because it implies both intent and execution.

                241 implies conspiracy to commit to a violation of rights which would fit the current argument better than 1983 since there’s a lack of motive and evidence against the DOJ for violating his sixth. it could be used as discovery to identify evidence between communications to lead to 1983.

                a crime is a crime, regardless of who/what committed it. the government is no exception, however it’s not like you can slap cuffs on the entire DOJ. those individuals involved would need to be charged for anything to stick. no different than if an employer killed an employee through neglect. those responsible would be charged, but the company would get off mostly unscathed.

                • Cruel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It is difficult to prove willful violation of rights (required for a criminal case) which is why it doesn’t happen often, even while people’s rights are violated routinely.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, well, well, if it isn’t the consequences of replacing competent career government officials with stooges.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      LOL, as if Democrats wouldn’t have railroaded him too. They 100% support the health care system that is killing people.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, that and the murder-friendly administration publicly announcing that you’re going to pursue the death penalty hard probably makes it a whole lot less likely people are gonna try a plea

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Conservative Justification: You have to be patient, and give the process time to gain momentum. If you need to accelerate the process, then more conservative policies need to be implemented, more harshly.

      I’ve been hearing that for literally 40 years. Shouldn’t those policies have kicked in by now?

      Oh, right, they did.

  • brem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Forcing that handsome man into a bullet proof vest in an attempt to make him look like a Batman villain should be enough evidence on its own for this to be thrown out.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I keep saying it: The one thing that may still save us, is their virtuosic incompetence. All we have to do is give these apes enough rope, and they will eventually hang themselves.

    The problem is all the damage they’ll do before then.

  • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    5 months ago

    It would be amazing if Luigi doesn’t even have to go through a trial because Trump cannot keep his mouth shut about anything.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Reporters need to start baiting Trump and DOJ shills. Force them to break and ruin any chance of this going to trial

  • anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Did anyone actually think he’s gonna get a fair trial? He’s obviously a patsy set up because they couldn’t find the real guy anyway. Who actually carries the weapon on the bus with them? The real one is probably at the bottom of the East River.

  • don@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Perpetual fuckups, par for the republican course.