Definitely killer of all jobs. Sad part is that I’m guessing it will take many lives before the hysteria is over
Maga math
PhD level, I tell ya.
I couldn’t keep up to that. It really teared my attention apart.
Yeah, “AI” is just statistical analysis. There’s more data in it’s database that indicates the 2027 is not year and only a few days worth of data that indicates that it is. Since there’s more data indicating 2027 is not next year, it chooses that as the correct answer.
LLMs are a useful tool if you know what it is, it’s strengths and weaknesses. But it’s not intelligent and doesn’t understand how things work. But if you have some fuzzy data you want analyzed and validate the results, it can save some time to get to a starting point. It’s kinda like wikipedia in a way, you get to a starting point faster, but have to take things with a grain of salt and put some effort make sure things are accurate.
Google pulled the AI overview from the search, but “is it 2027 next year ai overview” was a suggested search because this screenshot is making the rounds. The AI overview now has all the discussion of this error in it’s data set and mentions it in it’s reply but still fails.

This is why I can’t buy dram

Task unsuccessfully failed successfully.
That answer was wrong. So therefore, that answer was correct. No. Yes. Maybe.
Something, something “leap years”. Well that explains it.

AI has achieved the intelligence of the average voter
Hey don’t insult the average voter like that. This post demonstrates that ai has achieved the dementia level of Trump.
Lmao
I’m convinced this is why people are so seemingly impressed with AI. It’s smarter than the average person because the average person is that ignorant. To these people these things are ungodly smart and because of the puffery they don’t feel talked down to which increases their perception of it’s intelligence; it tells them how smart and clever they are in a way no sentient entity would ever do.
Yes. Remember that these things have been largely designed and funded by companies who make their money from advertising and marketing. The purpose of advertising and marketing is to convince people of something, whether that thing is actually true or not. They are experts at it, and now they have created software designed to convince people of things, whether it is actually true or not. Then they took all the combined might of their marketing and advertising expertise and infrastructure, including the AI software itself, and set it to the task of convincing people that AI is good and is going to change the world.
And everyone was convinced. Whether it is actually true or not.
Now ask it if 1/3 is smaller than 1/4.
A third pound burger for the same price as a quarter pounder? Hell yeah count me in! (~1980’s me)
Instead of advertising it as “a third,” maybe they should’ve dumbed it down a bit:
“More meat, better value!”
But according to the article you linked, these third pound burgers are still available at A&W after all these years. So at least their failed marketing campaign didn’t destroy them.
Yeah, this “sequence guesser” is definitely something we should have do all the coding, and control the entire Internet…
This is worth at least 500 trillion dollars!
We have a virtual parrot, it’s not “intelligence” in any way. So many suckers
Talking to AI is like talking to an 8-year-old. Has just enough information to be confidently wrong about everything.
An eight year old that takes everything literally.
My doubt is, why are people even asking these questions?
To show how unintelligent the AI actually is.
I could totally relate id the AI claimed it was still like 2020 or something
“Huh, me too buddy”
This isn’t just the machine being ignorant or wrong.
This is a level of artificial stupidity that is downright eldritch and incomprehensible
Seven acres of rainforest were burned and 37,000 gallons of water were wasted to answer this question.
…but at least the line went up a bit. That’s all that matters! 📈







