• ERROR: UserNotFound@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I know this is a parody, but:

    In the US, you might soon need a white “walking buddy” when they re-instate Jim Crow laws, because you wouldn’t be allowed to travel without a white man leading the group.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      i assume, if this were real, which it isn’t, the idea would be that everyone on the app has to pass a background check, so if you’re walking through an unfamiliar neighborhood and you’re a class of person who has reason to fear walking alone, you’d have someone there with you to help you be just a little more safe. obviously not as good as an actual trusted friend, but for certain people in certain situations, better than nothing

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          No different than getting in an Uber or taxi for that matter, except it’s harder to escape a car on the highway.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          no for sure. it’s just we live in hell and there’s gonna be times you’re gonna be somewhere and you’re like “even a pretend friendly stranger who sucks will be better than nothing”

          • corvi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even more so, a pretend friendly stranger that’s documented as being in your location.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        So they can’t hire anyone in the class of people who’d have reason to fear walking around in certain neighborhoods?

        Women, trans men, and certain minority groups would be discriminated against in their hiring? Or would using this service come with the risk of someone that’s more likely to get you targeted?

        I feel like this wouldn’t work for many reasons.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 months ago

    You know… There’s a lot of women that wouldn’t dare to walk alone at night. That white Kevin has been vetted by Uber and has a paper trail.

    How about not just a white Kevin but an Armed Stacey, or a security guard Michelle.

    of course, it’d probably cost MORE to get someone to walk with you because they’d have to not only drive there and walk but walk back.

      • SourGumGum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Especially because there’s a huge industry for fake driver accounts so literally anyone can buy an uber ‘employment’.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If Jimmy shows up in a black Toyota Camry with the right license plate, that’s one thing.

              I’d like to think that if Jimmy is your walking buddy, you might notice these kinds of things, tho :)

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    231
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly this is a great joke but also could legitimately be a good service for someone who didn’t feel safe walking alone, or needs help navigating

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        My school had a number you could call and they’d dispatch a golf cart with 2 student workers to take you anywhere on campus for free, 24/7 (minus holidays and breaks when University offices were cosed).

          • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Not really the same. Charging for this would discourage people from using it. They have to make a choice on feeling safe vs. spending money.

            This gives everyone the option and subsidizes it to the entire community.

            This is exactly why socializing things like this is beneficial.

            Every service has a cost. That cost is the value of the labor being provided. But we decide as a society that providing services like this benefits everyone living in society. Regardless of if they use it directly or not.

            When people say “free” in this context that’s what they mean. They mean the decision based on personal finance is removed.

            We don’t want people choosing personal finance over safety or health. Removing that dependency benefits everyone.

              • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Glad you got that! Its a major point in talking about social programs. If you can see this in college programs you can see the benefit when applied to social programs as well. Not sure if I can convince you of that too. But it’s always nice to get a response of “that makes sense” in this context.

          • BussyCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s also run by people vetted by the school who are also employees so they generally have other responsibilities and then the service doesn’t generate a profit. Which is a long way of saying it’s not even remotely close to being the same

      • exasperation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        John Mulaney has a joke about how his parents knew Bill Clinton that way, from all going to undergrad together at Georgetown. Apparently all the women loved being escorted by Bill Clinton, and the men were all jealous.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        I found out in my senior year, that my campus had been plagued by a serial rapist for several years, going back to before i was a freshman, and the school had covered it up. I only found out about it when i learned that my roommate’s girlfriend had a sorority sister on a full-ride scholarship to keep her quiet about being raped in her freshman year.

        Suddenly, the pressure to use their chaperone service became clear.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      Especially if they’d help carry your bags and whatnot; that could be very helpful for someone who has mobility issues or just has a lot of things they need to bring. Well worth $7.50

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Speaking as a person who does not fit the demographic for this service, the big problem I see with it is how you trust that the walking buddy is actually going to be safer than nothing. Uber drivers are somewhat regularly in the news for assaulting women and I know several women that don’t like riding them alone

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        If they actually matched up with the routes other people might take, I would do it. I’m always walking around downtown anyways, but I’m a relatively large poor-looking man so I never get hassled.

      • wunami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        The business model is to make it cheap initially by subsidizing it with investor capital. So, the gig worker may be paid more than the user is being charged. Then, eventually raise the price once the user base is large enough and dependent enough on it (or the prior alternative is sufficiently put out of business).

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s at least 5 years old and it seems every single year the news outlets “fact check” it and declare it false.

    Meanwhile we have actual conspiracy theories on official government websites and those same outlets say nothing.

    I hate this timeline.

    • ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      “In 2023, Uber reported its first annual profit since going public in 2019, with a net income of $1.9 billion. This follows a period of consistent losses for the company.”

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      unlike other comments, I’d argue, like most tech, it was incredibly profitable for anyone except the people funding it.

      Business is not about extracting money from goods and services, it’s about tricking VC funders to give you 50 million dollars a year

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Their whole business model is “wait for self driving and then $$$” as they’ll no longer have to pay anybody.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Never has been Earth astronauts gun meme

      No, but fr Uber is a masterclass in creative accounting and strategic acquisitions for further creative accounting.