• garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 个月前

      Ok but wearing shoes is a social construct. People didn’t wear shoes for thousands of years before shoes came along and they were just fine and full of blisters.

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      5 个月前

      Arguments like these don’t work with kids. Let them experience themselves what is best for them. And have spare socks ready in case they change their mind afterwards

      • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 个月前

        Sure, if that’s a reasonable option, but letting the kid hurt themselves isn’t always practical. Letting the kids find out ‘messing with the pot of boiling water is bad’ the hard way, as an example, is not what I would consider good parenting.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 个月前

          I think it’s pretty clear they’re referring to uncomfortable stuff, not dangerous stuff. Obviously don’t let them do dangerous stuff.

          • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 个月前

            Exactly. Always protect your little ones. It is okay if they experience negative consequences, as long as it doesn’t harm them.

            Trying to drink from a glass of water and get fully soaked is okay, even if the experience is not entirely positive.

            Touching a hot oven is not okay. Here you have to protect them. The best you can do is try to explain why it is not okay to touch it.

      • myslsl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 个月前

        Even if the argument doesn’t persuade them at the time it still makes sense to point it out to them so that they are (hopefully) aware of it later.

        • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 个月前

          Fully agree. Always verbalize your thoughts and intentions. Give the kids the ability to learn.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 个月前

      I don’t know what the social aspect is apart from how the socks appear, but this isn’t why they exist.

      Edit: Damn. Some of you are threatened by not knowing what a social construct is but really want to argue about socks instead of asking DDG so you can understand wtf is going on before leaving a comment.

      I’d be proud of this shit show, OP 🤣

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 个月前

        I love when people say “ackchyually you’re wrong” without offering an alternative.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 个月前

          Replying to wrong comment?

          You’ll have to explain otherwise, since it makes no sense based on what I said.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 个月前

          Warmth, protection, hygiene.

          If you were born the only person on earth, you would eventually have something like socks on your own accord. This is function, not social. They wouldn’t be Xmas themed though, since no society exists to have invented Xmas and to show off your socks to.

          Social constructs are, by definition, ideas or concepts.

        • VoidJuiceConcentrate@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 个月前

          if you didn’t wear socks then you’ll have to wash your shoes daily or risk getting something like a yeast infection of the foot or athletes foot.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 个月前

    Tell that kid that yes, everything is a social construct. But without social constructs he’d be dead. Wearing socks might be all that’s keeping him alive.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 个月前

    The next time they say “Socks are a social construct.” Tell them that blisters are punishment for man’s hubris.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 个月前

      Teenagers sometimes have to get blisters a few times before learning that it’s wiser to do the smart thing even if it wasn’t your idea.

      Then again, I know a few adults like that too.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      Yup, if you can manage to live off the grid and not have to worry about social constructs again, go for it, though I certainly wouldn’t recommend it.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        You would still be carrying the social constructs you have internalized throughout your life. You probably have the ability to think logically, and refer to things by their names, but logical thinking and language are also social constructs.

  • 200ok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    5 个月前

    Next time the kid asks for an allowance, say that money is a social construct

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 个月前

        See, I dunno about that one. I have a very strange and almost primal urge to feed kids. I think it’s generic programming.

        • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 个月前

          It took me a while to learn to control my rising angst when my son started deciding he didn’t want to eat much some days. Had to learn to trust what he’s saying and play it cool with bargaining with him to try things he’s decided he suddenly doesn’t like and eat just a few of the key food groups he hasn’t eaten before deciding he’s full.

          • Dale@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 个月前

            Same, there are few things more stressful to me than when my daughter doesn’t eat. Learning to be okay with a sorry dinner is a process I’m still going through

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 个月前

      Clothes as a concept started with utilitarian purposes like staying warm or cool. There are a lot of social constructs around clothes including when and what is worn in what contexts, but not the reason they exist in the first place.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 个月前

      Haha, I’m just picturing a dad saying, “so is your mom and I fucked the shit out of her. Now go put on your socks.”

      Edit: stupid autocorrect. stupid me for not noticing.

  • Leonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 个月前

    Reminds me of the time I saw people arguing on Reddit about the phrase “time is a social construct” where some people were completely incapable of understanding what that means and conflating the concept of time with the fundamental physics thingymcgee (idk how to call it and entity feels wrong).

    People were trying so hard to explain that minutes, months, seasons, etc. are all arbitrary things made up only for them to retort with “but a year is a full rotation of the sun” or “seasons exist because that’s how the planet changes its climate”.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 个月前

      the fundamental physics thingymcgee (idk how to call it and entity feels wrong)

      Your not wrong, “thingymcgee” is the technical term but it’s still a social construct just like gravity.