• Akasazh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    The thing I haven’t read in this thread: how do you get your personal trail car to the station, and how do you move it about on your destination?

    It sounds cool but very inflexible.

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      You pay for someone (another rail company operating at that railyard) to move it for you into storage, where you pay the storage costs. If you need that railcar somewhere else, you pay someone to transport it somewhere else, same as how cargo rail would work.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      It feels like the last time this service was used, everyone would have giant top hats, and their own personal railway spur to their houses.

  • BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    This one of those hobbies that sounds so cool but so impractical to get into. Like it makes getting a boat sound like a cheap and easy hobby.

    • matti@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Probably not too impractical owing to the fact that you probably aren’t allowed to do jack shit yourself. It’s not like you can tow it from the depot to the station with your f150. Much easier than owning a boat :) presumably just as pricey though and with even less utility

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    At the rate Amtrak derails or rail bridges go out? I think I’ll just fly Boeing.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re thinking of cargo rail. Amtrak owns the rails and the passenger service. They actually run way more than you probably think as they operate the northeast corridor as well as some of the other more serviced lines like the cascade corridor.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      How often do you think they derail, or bridges go out?

      I think over the last decade, I’ve heard of one incident.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This got me wondering. What if you build out a luxury trailer home in a shipping container. Could you just pay to have the thing shipped around while you’re living in it? It seems like it’s got to be efficient since there’s so much infrastructure and logistics for moving containers around.

  • DesertMagma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    No joke, at least back in the 80s some wall-streeters did thIs from my home town in Nj to NYC every day. Complete with full bar.

    • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      I started a conversation the other day with some friends about if I ever ran for President and needed to travel the country, what impact would there be if I decided to go super old-school and get a Presidential train car.

      Side conversation; Airforce 1 is the Airliner the Pres flies on. Marine 1 is the helicoper. What would be the train designation?

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Awful for security. Your whereabouts would be known at all times, and the USSS can’t protect every mile of track.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        US-CAR 1 or uscar 1. We’ve had several before so it’s not particularly an abstract.

        They’re all named after great explorers, Marco Polo, Ferdinand Magellan etc.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          So theoretically if we got a new president who was into using trains to get around we could have a high speed uscar1 named Neil Armstrong or Yuri Gagarin? Though I assume astronauts wouldn’t be considered explorers and would be reserved for spacecraft the president is on

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Correct though it’s unlikely any president will travel by train again given the best security is people simply not knowing where you are going or when. Being trapped in one direction is a big no no.

            • TehWorld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              You KNOW that they’d have a fleet of helicopters, AWACS, fighter jets and vehicle escorts just hanging around the side of the running train.

              • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                imagine getting to be late for school because your bus got stuck at a Presidential Train Crossing, and being able to see the copters and jets fly over.

                • TehWorld@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Was it McCain who said that he’d campaign in every state but was said to have regretted it because the time to travel to Hawaii, Alaska and a few other states (Idaho etc) were kid of a waste?

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It would be a statement, that’s for sure.

        Major problem is that Amtrak has the lowest priority on our rail network. Getting to a campaign rail-stop on time would be almost impossible without greasing some palms. So you’d have to hook up with a cargo rail line or something like that.

        Edit: Now, if you had “improve rail transportation” as a major platform plank, showing up late would be a feature, not a bug.

        • droans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Legally, passenger rail gets the highest priority.

          However, the punishment for violating this is a fine which hasn’t been updated in decades. The rail companies realized a long time ago that it’s better to just take the fine instead of actually following the law.

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This feels like a holdover from the Teddy Roosevelt/robber baron era!

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I really is. 34,000km vs 200,000km for the EU. An area of comparable size and population. Germany alone has about as much as the US.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m looking at this and it’s so sad. Not just that several states lack lines altogether, but… The existing lines lack some obvious interconnections. Where’s the OKC to Albuquerque line? Or even El Paso to Albuquerque. Get those two long distinct lines connected! Similarly, a shortcut to Denver from the line that goes through KC and Albuquerque? And I think Jacksonville should get direct lines to Atlanta and New Orleans.

        There’s so much that could be improved here with just a few tens of thousands of miles. Focus on better interconnections between the already existing routes first because it improves mobility for more people with fewer railroads to build, then build routes to cities currently completely unserviced (actually both should be done at the same time, just a bigger focus on the former early on)

    • apftwb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      4 months ago

      “I am rich but I don’t need to rush around the country to keep being rich”

      • akilou@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m gonna take my time and enjoy the ride. If you need me, come meet me on my train. I’m pulling into Kansas City tomorrow. See you there. Meanwhile I’m gonna have a cocktail and play some video games.